by Capt.Propwash » Thu Oct 06, 2011 3:09 pm
maybe someone will reply If you spend 10.000 dollars in a computer you can play FSX
My point exactly, and this is EXACTLY what it will take to even remotely enjoy Flight.
Has ANYONE.. anyone, ever seen the specs on the computers that Micro$oft uses to test and try out their 'games' (not just flight) but others as well?? Because THAT should be the Benchmark or Minimum requirement(s) on our systems so that we can get the same results that they get. Because, I can seriously say that they are NOT using a $300 Desktop bought at Walmart, but they are using a $5,000+ (possibly) Alienware computer. We are not as spoiled as they are, and they are not gonna give us the same results they get. If they did, we would be as happy as a lark and NOT need 3rd party designers except for aircraft (which I can only bet that FLIGHT is going to deal primarily with GA aircraft and not Heavy Tubes, or Military)
Here we go again with another let down.
Maybe Micro$oft needs to change the name of their product line to "MICRO$OFT CRASH" because to me, FS2000 was a stable platform, 2002=stable, 2004/FS9 = some problems but still fairly stable, FSX..."We're loosing altitude quickly", Flight =Green bar at the top saying "CRASH" and everyone goes back to FS9!!!! LMAO
The thoughts and expressions contained in the post above are solely my own, and not necessarily those of Simviation.com, its Moderators, its Staff, its Members, or other guests. They can not, are not, and will not be held liable for any thoughts, or expre