The only thing you can stay sure is that the beta testing process will be fast. It's hardly a secret that in M$ beta testing is only a front. A matter of being able "we did it", so to keep the buyers calm... and all the bugs still there, secure and cozy in the code, like before (else, if they did a serious beta-testing, how could be justified then the need for them to publish all the various patches-called-service-packs to follow?). Have only a little patience.
FS 2000 was a good upgrade from FS '98.
FS 2000 was a good upgrade from FS '98.
:-/ FS2000 was a backward step in my opinion. FS2002 was everything FS2000 should have been only 2 years late.
Following after Flight Unlimited II/III, Pro Pilot 1/2, Fly!, and a few others, I purchased each of the MS Flight Sims as soon as they were first released; FS '98, FS 2000, FS 2002, FS 2004, (and FSX).
From memory I cant remember having any major problems with any of the first four versions, '98 to 2004, as each one appeared to be a gentle upgrade from the previous version (hardware-wise).
It was only with the advent of FSX that my hardware limitations soon were to be an insurmountable problem (vast expense!), and still remain so!
I could never figure out, (and still cant), why FSX put such an immediate heavy demand on my system, compared to the previous versions!
FS 2000 (with its excellent manual!) was a good upgrade from FS '98. FS 2002 was a fantastic upgrade from FS 2000, and it took me some time to finally get around to running FS 2004 on my computer, as FS 2002 was so good!
I have been running FS 2004 now since it was first released and I was, and still am, delighted with it. Maximum settings.
Unfortunately, for some reason, the hardware demand for my FSX means that I can never use it to its full potential, (whatever that is!).
I will, no doubt, purchase "Flight" as soon as it is released, as I did with all the others, and time will tell if I can run it to my satisfaction... ...!
But at the moment, I am in no great hurry, and continue to enjoy my trusty FS 2004, day after day!
Paul...A collector of Sims... ...!
FS 2000 was a good upgrade from FS '98.
:-/ FS2000 was a backward step in my opinion. FS2002 was everything FS2000 should have been only 2 years late.
And to show that humans never really learn from their messing up, that wasn't the last time it happened too.
After all, it's only because M$ bailed out from FS11 that FSX is still around.
FS 2000 was a good upgrade from FS '98.
:-/ FS2000 was a backward step in my opinion. FS2002 was everything FS2000 should have been only 2 years late.
And to show that humans never really learn from their messing up, that wasn't the last time it happened too.
After all, it's only because M$ bailed out from FS11 that FSX is still around.
Strategic, I will point to the last line you printed in the above.(I haven't yet learned how to quote a single line from a post) I have no idea what you mean by saying the completion of an FS11 would have finished FSX. :-/
people want new stuff so when people know fs11 is out they would buy it and ignore fsx even if it is worse.
and fs11 is techicly flight.
I have no idea what you mean by saying the completion of an FS11 would have finished FSX. :-/
I have no idea what you mean by saying the completion of an FS11 would have finished FSX. :-/
No? :-?
The completion of a fully functional FS2002 pretty much thrashed the badly cobbled together FS2000, correct?
Now translate all six years in the relative future... with the hypothetical, never happened, arrival of a fully functional FS11, you think people would have remained on the badly cobbled together FSX?
History has this bad habit of repeating itself... :-/
PS
You can like it, you can use it, you can not think of use any other sim, nonetheless FSX remains badly cobbled together. It's a FACT corroborated by the evidence that a LOT of people, six years after FSX's publishing STILL uses FS9 and still doesn't plan on leaving it anytime soon, while after six months after the arrival of FS9 the users of FS2002 were few, sparse and waning.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 244 guests