M$flight Has nice looking trees (3d). So displaywise it is allot better than the current
M$flight Has nice looking trees (3d). So displaywise it is allot better than the current
Let me get this right, are you saying that the presence of 3-D trees will make a new sim "a lot better"?
best,
...........john
M$flight Has nice looking trees (3d). So displaywise it is allot better than the current
Let me get this right, are you saying that the presence of 3-D trees will make a new sim "a lot better"?
best,
...........john
I want to believe instead that something was or will be done... though some of the new aren't really encouraging and give your words the weight of truth... one of the things I really don't get, for example is: is it that ph***ing hard to have shadows out of the clouds? It's not like other sims do not have them, and since a long time too. :-?
Of course I am aware mine is a hope borne from desperation, but... well... :-/
What really concerns me is not so much the engine and/or other graphical details and/or performances under existing hardware, as unquestionably important as these are, but the still not contradicted rumor about the aberrant decision to trash the once open system you could upgrade, adding what you wanted from where you wanted, when you wanted and because, in exchange for a closed architecture that will make so M$ will retain the complete control on what, from where and why you can upgrade... hearing this, I had the perception that they're trying to scrape the bottom of the barrel, where said bottom of the barrel are our wallets, and it did NOT fill me with any confidence.
Remains though in our power to vote with our money, and if what they do with Flight is not good enough, we SHOULD leave it on the shelf... fact is... I have no confidence in some... for lack of a better fitting POLITE term let's call them people... doing that even if it was a complete mess and locked down in a totally blinded architecture, because there's always the "lovers of the new at all costs, even if it stinks to nirvana" out there that thoroughly ruin the environment for all the others.
You know at this point, I may just commit to buying it, just for you.
In fact I may buy two.
You are saying that if the product does not meet YOUR specifications, there must be a boycott. Further you state those that do not join you in a boycott of the product are something you would rather call names.
I am sure it would be a witty insult considering your carefully crafted spelling of a bad word. How original.
"Truly you have a dizzying intellect" -The Man in the Black mask.
Personally, I am quite content with the free market deciding if the product is worth it or not.
As for reading your threads. I have read what you have written. You suggested "we vote with our money", and that that others should do the same. That's called a boycott. You also show disdain for anyone who won't go along with you.
I, on the other hand, am perfectly okay with other people spending their money on what they think is best for them. Its their money after all, and I am not going to whine if they spend it on something I don't like.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 262 guests