MS Flight X

The latest and discontinued 'Flight' Game from Microsoft -

Re: MS Flight X

Postby Strategic Retreat » Sat Jul 02, 2011 1:33 pm

Yeah, seem almost otherworldly, doesn't it? Yet, if you ask M$, they will tell you that those specs are the bare minimum to make the program start... not to use it. That's the clever excuse (that NO law has EVER seen for what it is FOR REAL) to snag uninformed and unaware people. :P

After all... try and mount a legal case against MICROSOFT if you dare... ;D
Last edited by Strategic Retreat on Sat Jul 02, 2011 1:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.
There is no such a thing as overkill. Only unworthy targets.
Strategic Retreat
Captain
Captain
 
Posts: 643
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2011 10:40 am

Re: MS Flight X

Postby BrandonF » Sat Jul 02, 2011 9:02 pm

I love how you guys think that because FSX required a super computer to run, that Flight will be the same way. It's very funny.  ;D
BrandonF
Major
Major
 
Posts: 2288
Joined: Wed Apr 22, 2009 11:37 pm

Re: MS Flight X

Postby Strategic Retreat » Sun Jul 03, 2011 6:49 am

No, Brandon, EVERYONE of us can tell FOR SURE that Flight will perhaps have the performances angle corrected, but WILL be beleaguered by ANOTHER set of mistakes and errors that will make it unsuitable for some people... mistakes and errors we all spoke about in other threads and I'm not going to resume here because merely writing about it, here or elsewhere, never resolved NOTHING anyway.

And anyway, we were nor talking about it. We were simply examining the crystalline honesty M$ used into defining the minimum suggested specs for FSX.
Last edited by Strategic Retreat on Sun Jul 03, 2011 6:52 am, edited 1 time in total.
There is no such a thing as overkill. Only unworthy targets.
Strategic Retreat
Captain
Captain
 
Posts: 643
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2011 10:40 am

Re: MS Flight X

Postby JBaymore » Sun Jul 03, 2011 9:03 am

We were simply examining the crystalline honesty M$ used into defining the minimum suggested specs for FSX.


This was not limited to FSX.  Look backward.

Looking at the early pages and threads in the other MS simulator sections can be very enlightening.  As can living through every version since the original.

best,

............john
Image ImageIntel i7 960 quad 3.2G LGA 1366, Asus P6X58D Premium, 750W Corsair, 6 gig 1600 DDR3, Spinpoint 1TB 720
User avatar
JBaymore
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
 
Posts: 10020
Joined: Sat May 24, 2003 9:15 am
Location: New Hampshire

Re: MS Flight X

Postby Kim2506 » Mon Jul 18, 2011 10:44 am

But in all honesty, what are going to be some main differences between FSX and microsoft flight? By looking at the images, they both look the same. :-?

"same same, but different"...
"The surest sign that intelligent life exists elsewhere in the universe is that none of it has tried to contact us." Bill Watterson
Kim2506
Ground hog
Ground hog
 
Posts: 16
Joined: Sun Aug 17, 2008 7:10 am
Location: Switzerland

Re: MS Flight X

Postby lollebol » Sun Jul 31, 2011 4:31 pm

[quote]I love how you guys think that because FSX required a super computer to run, that Flight will be the same way. It's very funny.
Last edited by lollebol on Sun Jul 31, 2011 4:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.
lollebol
Ground hog
Ground hog
 
Posts: 1
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2011 4:00 pm

Previous

Return to Microsoft 'Flight'

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 276 guests