What we wish: Realism + Weather

The latest and discontinued 'Flight' Game from Microsoft -

What we wish: Realism + Weather

Postby SeanTK » Mon Sep 27, 2010 7:57 pm

Trying to organize our thoughts a bit more rather than having one thread. It will also be easier to see what everything thinks of a certain aspect of the forthcoming sim.

What are you looking for in the "Flight" weather system? What needs to be added/changed?

Aircraft physics...what needs to be adjusted, included, etc?

The small things that could add to immersion, what could they be/add?
SeanTK
 

Re: What we wish: Realism + Weather

Postby Boikat » Mon Sep 27, 2010 8:46 pm

Weather-wise, actual weather patterns would be nice, so if you're flying into a hurricane, you actually have the spiral feeder bands, the eye wall, and outragious winds.  Same for thunderstorms, with downdrafts, wind shear, hail, the occasional tornado..
Image
"I reject your reality, and substitute my own" Adam Savage, Mythbusters
User avatar
Boikat
Major
Major
 
Posts: 2974
Joined: Thu Mar 20, 2008 8:23 pm
Location: NW Loueezianner

Re: What we wish: Realism + Weather

Postby patchz » Mon Sep 27, 2010 9:55 pm

[quote]Weather-wise, actual weather patterns would be nice, so if you're flying into a hurricane, you actually have the spiral feeder bands, the eye wall, and outragious winds.
Image
If God intended aircraft engines to have horizontally opposed engines, Pratt and Whitney would have made them that way.
User avatar
patchz
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 10424
Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 7:33 pm
Location: IN THE FUNNY PAPERS

Re: What we wish: Realism + Weather

Postby Flying Trucker » Tue Sep 28, 2010 9:39 am

Excellent idea Roy... ;)

Cheers...Happy Landings...Doug
Cheers...Happy Landings...Doug
Flying Trucker
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 14361
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2005 12:28 pm

Re: What we wish: Realism + Weather

Postby Fozzer » Tue Sep 28, 2010 11:23 am

Realistic effects of "Icing" upon the Engine, Airframe, etc.

(Carburettor Icing, Pitot Tube Icing, Flying Surface Icing, etc).

Paul...G-BPLF..FS 2004...FS Nav..
Win 8.1 64-bit. DX11. Advent Tower. Intel i7-3770 3.9 GHz 8-core. 8 GB System RAM. AMD Radeon HD 7700 1GB RAM. DVD ROM. 2 Terra Byte SATA Hard Drive. Philips 17" LCD Monitor. Saitek Cyborg X Fly-5 Joystick. ...and a Briggs and Stratton Petrol Lawn Mower.
User avatar
Fozzer
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 27358
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2002 3:11 pm
Location: Hereford. England. EGBS.

Re: What we wish: Realism + Weather

Postby Travis » Tue Sep 28, 2010 11:55 am

Realistic effects of "Icing" upon the Engine, Airframe, etc.

(Carburettor Icing, Pitot Tube Icing, Flying Surface Icing, etc).

Paul...G-BPLF..FS 2004...FS Nav..


I have a feeling that this is much more plausible these days than it was in the past, Paul.
Last edited by Travis on Tue Sep 28, 2010 11:56 am, edited 1 time in total.
Image
User avatar
Travis
Major
Major
 
Posts: 4380
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 3:17 am
Location: KAUS - 30 MI NW

Re: What we wish: Realism + Weather

Postby alrot » Tue Sep 28, 2010 12:15 pm

Last edited by alrot on Tue Sep 28, 2010 12:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Image

Venezuela
User avatar
alrot
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 8961
Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2003 10:47 am

Re: What we wish: Realism + Weather

Postby f-35simpilot » Tue Sep 28, 2010 1:49 pm

Wingtip vortices and C-130 prop-tip style lines ... You know what i mean, sound cones, when in tower view and you go by supersonic you get sonic BOOM, and all high g effects when enogh moisture in the air... Also I apologize for poor grammar, I am doing this post from my phone and I am lazyJ
Carriers would be so mush easier to land on if they would just stop turning!!!
f-35simpilot
1st Lieutenant
1st Lieutenant
 
Posts: 322
Joined: Mon May 04, 2009 11:12 am
Location: Coquitlam, Beautiful B.C.

Re: What we wish: Realism + Weather

Postby patchz » Wed Sep 29, 2010 1:35 am

[quote]Another thing that would be interesting to see would be a dynamic and changing planet.
Image
If God intended aircraft engines to have horizontally opposed engines, Pratt and Whitney would have made them that way.
User avatar
patchz
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 10424
Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 7:33 pm
Location: IN THE FUNNY PAPERS

Re: What we wish: Realism + Weather

Postby xtp » Wed Sep 29, 2010 10:03 am

I'd like to see more realistic high-res 3-d scenery areas - both around airfields and elsewhere - together with a tighter elevation mesh and photo-realistic (best Google-Earth-like) photo terrain at a high-enough resolution for realistic low flying worldwide.
xtp
2nd Lieutenant
2nd Lieutenant
 
Posts: 62
Joined: Sun Apr 27, 2003 12:59 pm

Re: What we wish: Realism + Weather

Postby SeanTK » Wed Sep 29, 2010 10:10 am

A few ideas from me:
Turbulence & condensation when going through clouds.
Wake turbulence.
Visible icing.
Aircraft vibration.
Steering and braking power affected by surface conditions.
SeanTK
 

Re: What we wish: Realism + Weather

Postby specter177 » Wed Sep 29, 2010 11:10 am

I'll just combine what everyone is saying into one sentence.

We want Star Trek Holodeck level realism that will run on a Pentium 4.
ImageImage
User avatar
specter177
Major
Major
 
Posts: 1369
Joined: Sat Sep 24, 2005 2:33 pm
Location: KDAY

Re: What we wish: Realism + Weather

Postby patchz » Wed Sep 29, 2010 12:47 pm

I'll just combine what everyone is saying into one sentence.

We want Star Trek Holodeck level realism that will run on a Pentium 4.

[color=#000000] ;D ;D ;D
Yeah, but was it Keith Richards that said, "you can't always get what you want"?
Image
If God intended aircraft engines to have horizontally opposed engines, Pratt and Whitney would have made them that way.
User avatar
patchz
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 10424
Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 7:33 pm
Location: IN THE FUNNY PAPERS

Re: What we wish: Realism + Weather

Postby Boikat » Wed Sep 29, 2010 2:36 pm

Some more environmental stuff..

Water was mentioned.  I'd like actual, rolling waves. I want whitecaps when the wind is strong enough.  I whant hit-knuckle waterlanding in a Goose.

For that matter, ditching.  If you ditch right, you should not crash, even though ditching is technically crashing, or rather, and emergency water landing. Add to that (though it would be part of the model), life rafts popping out and passengers disembarking (Heck, that'd be nice for the air-stairs....)

Come to mention it, even crashing should be doable.  A nice gear-up belly landing should not result in "end of game" so to speak.  Of course, it basically *is*, but you should have all the time you want in order to admire your handy-work, be it a "soft as a baby's bottom skid to a stop, or a towering pillar of smoke and fire comming from a crater.

No "crash" if you brush againt a tree-top with your wing tip. By all means, "crash" when you actually crash, but winging a twig shouldn't be fatal. Damage the aircraft, sure, to the appropriate extent. Again, that probably needs to be built into the model.

Two words:  "Bird strikes".

Just more thoughts.....
Image
"I reject your reality, and substitute my own" Adam Savage, Mythbusters
User avatar
Boikat
Major
Major
 
Posts: 2974
Joined: Thu Mar 20, 2008 8:23 pm
Location: NW Loueezianner

Re: What we wish: Realism + Weather

Postby patchz » Wed Sep 29, 2010 5:28 pm

And good thoughts they are Roy. I would like to see them as well. :)
Image
If God intended aircraft engines to have horizontally opposed engines, Pratt and Whitney would have made them that way.
User avatar
patchz
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 10424
Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 7:33 pm
Location: IN THE FUNNY PAPERS

Next

Return to Microsoft 'Flight'

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 248 guests