Confusion over scenery add-ons.....
Let's say I have Megascenery Southern California in my FSX scenery database. And then I happen across a scenery add-on for KSAN on Simviation.....
My question is, how does FSX deal with potentially redundant scenery? In this particular case, I don't know whether Megascenery OR the add-on for KSAN is going to be "better".
On another interesting note, KLAS is purported to be a "high detail" airport in FSX deluxe, but NOT Las Vegas itself. However, I find Las Vegas (city) to be one of the most detailed cities.
Wondering what others might think?
My question is, how does FSX deal with potentially redundant scenery? In this particular case, I don't know whether Megascenery OR the add-on for KSAN is going to be "better".
On another interesting note, KLAS is purported to be a "high detail" airport in FSX deluxe, but NOT Las Vegas itself. However, I find Las Vegas (city) to be one of the most detailed cities.
Wondering what others might think?