beta

FSX including FSX Steam version.

beta

Postby redspartan126 » Tue Sep 19, 2006 5:43 pm

Is the real game gonna be that huge like 12gigs cuz great i wont be installing it on this comp.
hey hey
redspartan126
Ground hog
Ground hog
 
Posts: 13
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 11:38 am

Re: beta

Postby Airshow_lover » Tue Sep 19, 2006 5:56 pm

According to microsoft,


14 GB
C/SMSgt - Civil Air Patrol
User avatar
Airshow_lover
Major
Major
 
Posts: 1615
Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2006 3:18 pm
Location: LaVergne, TN

Re: beta

Postby Katahu » Tue Sep 19, 2006 6:02 pm

Is the real game gonna be that huge like 12gigs cuz great i wont be installing it on this comp.


You'll need a bigger hard drive, my friend. Preferably an internal one rather than those USB-based ones because loading time is noticably higher when the sim is installed on the USB ones due to the time it takes for the information to be processed through the USB connector.

Also, because most games are becoming more cocmplex and more detailed in the gaming industry, it shouldn't surprise you that the sim will measure 14GB.
User avatar
Katahu
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 5993
Joined: Mon Jul 22, 2002 10:29 pm

Re: beta

Postby Calb » Tue Sep 19, 2006 10:09 pm

Can someone point me to an OFFICIAL SOURCE that states it is 14Gb ?

Cal
CYXX
Calb
1st Lieutenant
1st Lieutenant
 
Posts: 343
Joined: Thu May 16, 2002 5:34 am

Re: beta

Postby Jakemaster » Tue Sep 19, 2006 10:20 pm

14 GB available hard disk space


Source: http://www.microsoft.com/games/pc/flightsimulatorx.aspx
Jakemaster
 

Re: beta

Postby Jakemaster » Tue Sep 19, 2006 10:26 pm


You'll need a bigger hard drive, my friend. Preferably an internal one rather than those USB-based ones because loading time is noticably higher when the sim is installed on the USB ones due to the time it takes for the information to be processed through the USB connector.

Also, because most games are becoming more cocmplex and more detailed in the gaming industry, it shouldn't surprise you that the sim will measure 14GB.


And most of us already have WAY more than 14GB of FS9, within 2 months (yes I said 2 months) of getting FS most people will have added at least 1 gigabyte onto FS, if not more
Jakemaster
 

Re: beta

Postby Katahu » Tue Sep 19, 2006 10:38 pm


most people will have added at least 1 gigabyte onto FS, if not more


You mean 30GB like some of us no-lives. ::)
User avatar
Katahu
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 5993
Joined: Mon Jul 22, 2002 10:29 pm

Re: beta

Postby Bindoe » Tue Sep 19, 2006 11:28 pm

My fs9 folder is approaching 40gb. Anyway, does space really matter? Harddisks are cheap, 14gb is nothing to you're average 160gb drive, and if you need more, buy a bigger one ;)
Bindoe
 

Re: beta

Postby Hai Perso Coyone? » Wed Sep 20, 2006 10:37 am


You'll need a bigger hard drive, my friend. Preferably an internal one rather than those USB-based ones because loading time is noticably higher when the sim is installed on the USB ones due to the time it takes for the information to be processed through the USB connector.

Also, because most games are becoming more cocmplex and more detailed in the gaming industry, it shouldn't surprise you that the sim will measure 14GB.


Actually, from my personal experience, that is not true...I have a 400GB USB HDD and it performs better than my internal one...loading times are much faster...the same scenery with the same add-ons took at least 30 seconds to load...compared to my new FS9 installation, that was cut down to around 15-20 seconds...reasonably faster.. ;)
User avatar
Hai Perso Coyone?
Ground hog
Ground hog
 
Posts: 0
Joined: Fri Jan 12, 2007 7:31 pm
Location: Rome, Italy

Re: beta

Postby Bindoe » Wed Sep 20, 2006 10:50 am

Was it an IDE SATA 1 HD?
Bindoe
 

Re: beta

Postby Katahu » Wed Sep 20, 2006 10:56 am


Actually, from my personal experience, that is not true...I have a 400GB USB HDD and it performs better than my internal one...loading times are much faster...the same scenery with the same add-ons took at least 30 seconds to load...compared to my new FS9 installation, that was cut down to around 15-20 seconds...reasonably faster.. ;)


Well, I said what I said from experience. I have an external HD [250GB] with FS2004 installed and it seemed to perform poorly in the external one compared to being run from the internal one.
User avatar
Katahu
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 5993
Joined: Mon Jul 22, 2002 10:29 pm

Re: beta

Postby Ridge_Runner_5 » Wed Sep 20, 2006 11:27 pm

Beta 3 was 13.7gb with the Carenado 206 and a couple dozen gauges installed...figure 13.6~ish clean install.

That is why it comes on 2 DVDs...
Ridge_Runner_5
Captain
Captain
 
Posts: 506
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2002 8:41 pm
Location: Every which way at once!

Re: beta

Postby Ashton Lawson » Thu Sep 21, 2006 2:54 am

about the hard drive thing.

I don't think it is SATA, cuz they can go 3Gb/s.  I think its the old IDE, like i still hav now.  Gonna get SATA tho.
Image
FS Water Configurator+ has new modifications in the works, plus DirectX 10, Service Pack
1, and Radeon HD 3+ Series support.
Ashton Lawson
Major
Major
 
Posts: 1211
Joined: Thu Jun 15, 2006 5:25 am
Location: Phuket, Thailand

Re: beta

Postby 61695 » Thu Sep 21, 2006 3:50 pm

I'm betting that 5400rpm HDDs aint gonna cut it .
User avatar
61695
Ground hog
Ground hog
 
Posts: 4
Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 6:23 am


Return to Flight Simulator X (FSX) and Steam

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 519 guests