Page 1 of 2

Landing question

PostPosted: Tue Jan 17, 2006 11:46 am
by Papa9571
Was there any commercial jet aircraft, not Russian, that was designed to land on a gravel runway?

Re: Landing question

PostPosted: Tue Jan 17, 2006 11:55 am
by KDSM
I beleive the 737 could with some attachments

Re: Landing question

PostPosted: Tue Jan 17, 2006 12:05 pm
by Papa9571
Not officially according to Boeing.

Re: Landing question

PostPosted: Tue Jan 17, 2006 2:19 pm
by garymbuska
I think the Lear is capeable of landing on gravel because of where the engines are located up high on the tail. Of course You can allways check out manufctuer to make sure, but I have seen several movies of them doing this but one has to rember this is the movies and I do not know if the plane was modifed in any way.
But I would not even think of landing a B737 on gravel because of where the engines are located. I used to work at KJAX and we used to refer to the b737-800 as the flying vacum cleaner those engines would suck any loose gravel right off the ground even in idle mode. ;D 8)

Re: Landing question

PostPosted: Tue Jan 17, 2006 2:36 pm
by Hai Perso Coyone?
I think the Lear is capeable of landing on gravel because of where the engines are located up high on the tail.


In that case the MD-80 should also be able to do it them as the engines are really high up... ;)

Re: Landing question

PostPosted: Tue Jan 17, 2006 4:21 pm
by garymbuska
ASHAR
It would depend on the length of the runway and the type of gravel due to the vast weight differance between the two MD80's are a little heavier than Lear's so unless the gravel was really packed hard I would be leary landing anything much heavier than a lear. 8)

Re: Landing question

PostPosted: Tue Jan 17, 2006 4:52 pm
by Jakemaster
Well, I believe the C-17 can land on gravel

Re: Landing question

PostPosted: Tue Jan 17, 2006 7:12 pm
by Papa9571
Yes it can but the C-17 is not a comercial bird either.

In the manufacturer docs this aircraft, at least in it's first version was designed to be used on gravel runways. The MD-80 doesn't fit becasue of that limitation.

Re: Landing question

PostPosted: Tue Jan 17, 2006 7:23 pm
by Brett_Henderson
I would imagine that any of them "could" land on gravel and as much as airliners are side-loaded.. gravel might even be better. It's the taking off part .. with the engines sucking in all that air that would be a problem.

Oh yeah.. thrust reversers  :-[

Never-mind...

Re: Landing question

PostPosted: Tue Jan 17, 2006 7:41 pm
by flyboy 28
Why would you want to? It would effectivey rip up the undercarriage with pebbles and cause maybe thousands of (insert currency here) to repair it. ::)

Re: Landing question

PostPosted: Tue Jan 17, 2006 8:38 pm
by elite marksman
Well, it might not seem like such a bad idea if say, your in a 737 and your port engine decides to detach itself from the wing.

Re: Landing question

PostPosted: Tue Jan 17, 2006 8:54 pm
by ashaman
I remember having read something about a 727 that was modified for landing on gravel runways in Alaska, sometime ago. ???

Don't remember much about it, though.

Re: Landing question

PostPosted: Tue Jan 17, 2006 9:24 pm
by Papa9571
Bingo..

Give ashaman a cigar

The 727-100 in its first incarnation was also designed and certified to land and takeoff from gravel runways.

The 727 design was started in 1956 and there were a lot of gravel runways that the airlines still used at that time.

Re: Landing question

PostPosted: Tue Jan 17, 2006 11:44 pm
by KDSM
So was this question a triva question that you already knew th answer to?

If it is and i had known that i would have tried harder  ;D

Re: Landing question

PostPosted: Wed Jan 18, 2006 7:17 am
by gottoflynow
I think i've seen pics of a Fokker F-28 next to a gravel strip somewhere. Dont know where though.

-gottoflynow