by Gary R. » Sat Jan 21, 2006 12:46 pm
Well, it could all be imaginary but I do seem to recall that FS performs best for me after newly installed and before a lot of add-on aircraft are installed. It seems to me that the smaller the FS folders are the better the sim moves along. When I installed FS first on my new hard drive, which I am reformatting this weekend I was getting 10-15 FPS higher with the same aircraft than I was getting on FS installation on drive C which was at that time much heavier. Lately I've noticed that the performance became more the same between the two drives. I thought at first the performance increase was due to the fact that my new hard drive is a 7200 RPM with 8 meg cache versus 5200 RPM, 2 meg cashe on my old drive which is still C drive here. It could be that the drive speeds and caching wern't the performance edge because those figures don't deteriorate with use but the clutter on the other hand increases and as my "F" drive FS installation got heavier and became as cluttered as the "C" drive installation the performance deteriorated to match. I will certainly start benchmarking after my re-format and re-installation.
AMD 2800xp on gigabyte vt600l k7 triton overclocked @ 2.3 ghz, 768 PC 3200, 128 DDR 6600GT AGP, 60 gig,5200 rpm maxtor, 160gig 7200rpm WD, Sony FD Trinitron 19