Simviation Forums

Decided to finally start learning IFR ops in the sim today; the FS9 lessons are not so bad in the IFR portion, and I was actually able to satisfy the usually-insane virtual Rod Machado. Did a few VOR approaches on my own (really the first time I've done so in earnest), and here are the results:

Definitely a tendency start chasing both the OBS and ADF here... LOL.




Just a smidge below the 920-foot MDA, I spied the runway. It's very hard to fly even the RealAir C172 like this: just does not behave enough like the real thing to make those small corrections smoothly.





2nd attempt: turned a bit late after crossing the radial:





Again, veering around the NDB for some reason: I broke out more in line with the runway on this one, at least...



On the third pass, I tried a missed approach as per the chart. Not great, but not too bad.



Pretty excited about continuing this, but eventually, to practice until I've acquired the sim equivalent of all the hours needed for the checkride, I'll be creating training flights from scratch...
My question about that is: how can you incorporate the FS9 ATC into this without them constantly trying to vector you? Is the only choice to ignore their commands to do what you're doing anyway,listening only for traffic calls, clearances, etc.? I get the feeling that even if I requested the published VOR approach they'd have me doing something else.
And another question: had I told ATC I was on that missed approach, what would their directions have been? Would they vector me back to the proper radial for the VOR approach to 34R without having me circle?

I need to learn how to do that..

I need to learn how to do that..

It is not easy. The CG instructor is a little more sensible than I've experienced trying the PP lessons, but it's annoying. Just started the ILS approach lessons, and "Rod" decided on short final to tell me how to flare... about 50 times. I need to get a dummy to sit next to me so I can hit it in the mouth whenever the sim does that...
But I did get a "good job!" comment on my first ILS approach... very satisfying to pull it off, albeit not very smoothly.

Congrats man  :)
I know you've got the flying down pat, so you'll be executing ILS approaches with your eyes shut in no time  :P

Ya know this is funny, I was just thinking about doing the same set of courses after an entire flight of IFR. Of course no autopilot.

Looks like your close to getting your cert. Good luck.

I'm surprised at you, rottydaddy - all those 'hours' (3,500 posts) rising to Resident status and you've been skipping your homework all this time!  :)

I'll be creating training flights from scratch...
My question about that is: how can you incorporate the FS9 ATC into this without them constantly trying to vector you?

Don't understand the problem? As far as I know, flying IFR, FS9 ATC will only ever give you vectors and heights to final approach - never VOR-to-VOR. But why not plan your flight VFR anyway? That way, they'll only give you a circuit direction and landing runway, not specific vectors? If you want to set up some 'nice' IFR weather, maybe do it after you take off?

For my part, I found Rod Machado very good at first, but very annoying later on. I got the hang of flying IFR mostly by doing the ready-made 'Aerial Chauffeur' scenario in the Flights Menu.

The weather is typical New England (i.e. grey and blustery) throughout - the required skill standard is cleverly planned, scenario by scenario, to rise gradually from 'Huh - piece of cake!' ('Book Signing in Provincetown') through 'This is going to be tricky' (Lecture in Northampton') to 'Oh my Gawd!' ('Home at Last').

For even bigger challenges, try some of the 'Reeve Aleutian Airlines' scenarios. One of the advantages of the ready-made 'scenarios' is that you don't have to use the assigned aircraft (in that case, the DC3 Dakota) - you can substitute any other type.

Highly recommended!  :)

I started the IFR lessons after passing my PPL - but haven't finished them. I just haven't the time for much flying and the lessons require a lot of flying not spanned out over many weeks. When I do get the odd hour I like to fly properly.

The problem with FS is you never really know what type of approach ATC will give you. I am not sure if it uses STARS or not but I have had them take me out quite some way before finally vectoring back for a landing. I know in the real world every airport has a unique pattern you fly on a missed approach but not sure if fs uses that or not.
But if you have the plates handy for the airport you are at you can fly the actual missed approach pattern if you are flying VFR.

I'm surprised at you, rottydaddy - all those 'hours' (3,500 posts) rising to Resident status and you've been skipping your homework all this time!  :)

Yes, it's quite possible I've spent more time talking about FS9 than flying it... . But I have occasional  bouts of seriousness about it; this is one of them. I'm actually preparing myself for pursuit of a RL  instrument rating (just as soon as I find a sack of money)... training with this sim won't hurt any. It's  much harder to trim and stabilize the virtual C172 on instruments than the real thing, so I figure if I can pass the checkride despite that (and the crazy virtual instructor), I might have an edge...

Don't understand the problem? As far as I know, flying IFR, FS9 ATC will only ever give you vectors and heights to final approach - never VOR-to-VOR. But why not plan your flight VFR anyway? That way, they'll only give you a circuit direction and landing runway, not specific vectors? If you want to set up some 'nice' IFR weather, maybe do it after you take off?

For my part, I found Rod Machado very good at first, but very annoying later on. I got the hang of flying IFR mostly by doing the ready-made 'Aerial Chauffeur' scenario in the Flights Menu.

The weather is typical New England (i.e. grey and blustery) throughout - the required skill standard is cleverly planned, scenario by scenario, to rise gradually from 'Huh - piece of cake!' ('Book Signing in Provincetown') through 'This is going to be tricky' (Lecture in Northampton') to 'Oh my Gawd!' ('Home at Last').

For even bigger challenges, try some of the 'Reeve Aleutian Airlines' scenarios. One of the advantages of the ready-made 'scenarios' is that you don't have to use the assigned aircraft (in that case, the DC3 Dakota) - you can substitute any other type.

Highly recommended!  :)

Makes sense to file VFR so they'll leave me alone...  ;D
First time i tried a flight from another field to a VORapproach at KSEA, even though I created an IFR plan, when I got cleared they immediately vectored me to a fix I hadn't selected ( !!)
Maybe I should think of flying with ATC vectoring me as "dual"...

I've done a couple of ILS approaches now; not too tricky, really. I've been using the Silver Wings "Gray Day" wx for all flights: ceiling @ 1000, and a few bumps here and there. I find it much easier to concentrate on my IFR scan with nothing but gray visible outside. And oh, the FPS!!!
I haven't tried the "Aerial Chaffeur" flights yet, but did some VFR DC3 flying on those "Reeve " flights.

Agree entirely about the C172 - almost impossible to trim hands-off. And the default Beech Baron is even worse, downright 'orrible. If you haven't tried the Mooney, maybe give it a go? Broadly similar to the Cessna, just a bit faster -  and much more 'trimmable'.

About filing VFR but wanting to simulate IFR conditions - why not just set your practice flights up at night with a fair bit of low cloud?