Page 1 of 2
		
			
				No Concorde
				
Posted: 
Fri Dec 12, 2003 10:53 amby Dave_A
				Hi All
A minor grumble from a humble Brit (English actually and we are Rugby world champs).  
If Fs2004 is celebrating a century of flight how come no Concorde????  Surely a milestone in world history not just aviation.
Perhaps it is seen differently across the pond 

 
			
		
			
				Re: No Concorde
				
Posted: 
Fri Dec 12, 2003 10:59 amby JVC_systems
				I was also wondering why Microsoft left out Concorde. And it is such a great aircraft too!! You can download it thought if you want. There a very nice one avalable for download 

 
			
		
			
				Re: No Concorde
				
Posted: 
Fri Dec 12, 2003 2:38 pmby ozzy72
				Try the Project Mach 2 Concorde model, its AWESOME!
Its available at a number of sites on the web, and the updates for more realistic flight dynamics and cockpit are available here under the FS2k2 downloads 

Ozzy
 
			
		
			
				Re: No Concorde
				
Posted: 
Fri Dec 12, 2003 2:47 pmby pete
				
			 
			
		
			
				Re: No Concorde
				
Posted: 
Fri Dec 12, 2003 3:01 pmby Matt
				[quote]Hi All
A minor grumble from a humble Brit (English actually and we are Rugby world champs).
			 
			
		
			
				Re: No Concorde
				
Posted: 
Fri Dec 12, 2003 3:02 pmby ozzy72
				Thanks Pete, I couldn't remember that. And don't forget that telecharger is French for download 
 
 
Ozzy
 
			
		
			
				Re: No Concorde
				
Posted: 
Fri Dec 12, 2003 3:07 pmby JW
				Some screenies I took while flying her from Nairobi to EHAM: 
have a look if your interested.
Bear in mind I was missing the VC textures while these were taken. Mix up  :-[
 
			
		
			
				Re: No Concorde
				
Posted: 
Sat Dec 13, 2003 6:23 amby Dave_A
				[quote]
We'll see who the real world champions are in the 6 nations.
			 
			
		
			
				Re: No Concorde
				
Posted: 
Sat Dec 13, 2003 6:25 amby Dave_A
				Thanx for the pointers guys
Have downloaded the mach2 project, anyone used this in Fs2004?
Cheers
			 
			
		
			
				Re: No Concorde
				
Posted: 
Sat Dec 13, 2003 9:23 amby Matt
				And where did Wales come in the last 6 nations? You should not base a challenge on one fair performance. 

2 I'll have you know. The All Blacks were rattled and Engand were "technically" Beaten by wales. Yawn oh well we'll see come march  ;)
 
			
		
			
				Re: No Concorde
				
Posted: 
Sat Dec 13, 2003 9:27 amby Craig.
				concorde was not included for a few reasons, microsoft explained those reasons. 
they were along these lines:
Concorde has a very complex flight model, and to the average flyer of flight sim, far to complex to make it a worth while addition. 
The designers have to take rides on all the aircraft or at very least get all the info they can, they couldnt get all the information required for concorde, so couldnt make it a complete model.
there were a few other reasons and if you search the in game news menu they are in there, i believe it was in a subject titled, how We select flight sim aircraft.
			 
			
		
			
				Re: No Concorde
				
Posted: 
Sat Dec 13, 2003 12:06 pmby bm
				Concorde has a very complex flight model, and to the average flyer of flight sim, far to complex to make it a worth while addition.
If this was the argument then why is the wright flyer in FS then? They could have at least had Concorde AI....
But I understand the other reasons that you explained last time this arguement came up  ::)
 
			
		
			
				Re: No Concorde
				
Posted: 
Sat Dec 13, 2003 12:17 pmby Hagar
				[quote]microsoft explained those reasons.
			 
			
		
			
				Re: No Concorde
				
Posted: 
Sat Dec 13, 2003 1:55 pmby Dave_A
				Same poor excuses from microsoft I think 

Has anybody got the mach2 concorde infs2004??
I downloaded it and it aint appearing any other downloads that can be recommended?
And Matt how is a team technically beaten 

you guys should give praise when its deserved. Wales did well considering there recent problems 

 
			
		
			
				Re: No Concorde
				
Posted: 
Sat Dec 13, 2003 2:46 pmby Craig.
				microsoft admited their concorde model from 2000, wasnt at all that good, and to keep it realistic would have required a major overhaul of its entire config.
i will try and find the link so you can all read it for yourself