Page 1 of 2
No Concorde

Posted:
Fri Dec 12, 2003 10:53 am
by Dave_A
Hi All
A minor grumble from a humble Brit (English actually and we are Rugby world champs).
If Fs2004 is celebrating a century of flight how come no Concorde???? Surely a milestone in world history not just aviation.
Perhaps it is seen differently across the pond

Re: No Concorde

Posted:
Fri Dec 12, 2003 10:59 am
by JVC_systems
I was also wondering why Microsoft left out Concorde. And it is such a great aircraft too!! You can download it thought if you want. There a very nice one avalable for download

Re: No Concorde

Posted:
Fri Dec 12, 2003 2:38 pm
by ozzy72
Try the Project Mach 2 Concorde model, its AWESOME!
Its available at a number of sites on the web, and the updates for more realistic flight dynamics and cockpit are available here under the FS2k2 downloads

Ozzy
Re: No Concorde

Posted:
Fri Dec 12, 2003 2:47 pm
by pete
Re: No Concorde

Posted:
Fri Dec 12, 2003 3:01 pm
by Matt
[quote]Hi All
A minor grumble from a humble Brit (English actually and we are Rugby world champs).
Re: No Concorde

Posted:
Fri Dec 12, 2003 3:02 pm
by ozzy72
Thanks Pete, I couldn't remember that. And don't forget that telecharger is French for download

Ozzy
Re: No Concorde

Posted:
Fri Dec 12, 2003 3:07 pm
by JW
Some screenies I took while flying her from Nairobi to EHAM:
have a look if your interested.
Bear in mind I was missing the VC textures while these were taken. Mix up :-[
Re: No Concorde

Posted:
Sat Dec 13, 2003 6:23 am
by Dave_A
[quote]
We'll see who the real world champions are in the 6 nations.
Re: No Concorde

Posted:
Sat Dec 13, 2003 6:25 am
by Dave_A
Thanx for the pointers guys
Have downloaded the mach2 project, anyone used this in Fs2004?
Cheers
Re: No Concorde

Posted:
Sat Dec 13, 2003 9:23 am
by Matt
And where did Wales come in the last 6 nations? You should not base a challenge on one fair performance.

2 I'll have you know. The All Blacks were rattled and Engand were "technically" Beaten by wales. Yawn oh well we'll see come march ;)
Re: No Concorde

Posted:
Sat Dec 13, 2003 9:27 am
by Craig.
concorde was not included for a few reasons, microsoft explained those reasons.
they were along these lines:
Concorde has a very complex flight model, and to the average flyer of flight sim, far to complex to make it a worth while addition.
The designers have to take rides on all the aircraft or at very least get all the info they can, they couldnt get all the information required for concorde, so couldnt make it a complete model.
there were a few other reasons and if you search the in game news menu they are in there, i believe it was in a subject titled, how We select flight sim aircraft.
Re: No Concorde

Posted:
Sat Dec 13, 2003 12:06 pm
by bm
Concorde has a very complex flight model, and to the average flyer of flight sim, far to complex to make it a worth while addition.
If this was the argument then why is the wright flyer in FS then? They could have at least had Concorde AI....
But I understand the other reasons that you explained last time this arguement came up ::)
Re: No Concorde

Posted:
Sat Dec 13, 2003 12:17 pm
by Hagar
[quote]microsoft explained those reasons.
Re: No Concorde

Posted:
Sat Dec 13, 2003 1:55 pm
by Dave_A
Same poor excuses from microsoft I think

Has anybody got the mach2 concorde infs2004??
I downloaded it and it aint appearing any other downloads that can be recommended?
And Matt how is a team technically beaten

you guys should give praise when its deserved. Wales did well considering there recent problems

Re: No Concorde

Posted:
Sat Dec 13, 2003 2:46 pm
by Craig.
microsoft admited their concorde model from 2000, wasnt at all that good, and to keep it realistic would have required a major overhaul of its entire config.
i will try and find the link so you can all read it for yourself