Page 1 of 1

Are lower MESH numbers better then higher?

PostPosted: Wed Feb 25, 2004 10:43 pm
by uncertainty
This is a newbie question but do higher MESH numbers (ie 76m) give better image quality then lower (ie 32m)?

thanks

Re: Are lower MESH numbers better then higher?

PostPosted: Wed Feb 25, 2004 10:56 pm
by SilverFox441
The numbers tell you how far apart reference points are in the terrain.

Any detail smaller than the distance between reference points will not be shown, or will be "averaged" with nearby terrain detail.

When you work all that out, smaller numbers means bigger detail. :)

Re: Are lower MESH numbers better then higher?

PostPosted: Wed Feb 25, 2004 11:59 pm
by svenpurple7
SilverFox is correct.
Also, be aware that with meshes you will sometimes see another number called LOD (level of detail).  With that number lower means better.  Don't confuse the two numbers.

Re: Are lower MESH numbers better then higher?

PostPosted: Thu Feb 26, 2004 10:34 am
by Jared
The smaller the number the better! :-)

Re: Are lower MESH numbers better then higher?

PostPosted: Thu Feb 26, 2004 11:59 am
by Joe_D
[quote]SilverFox is correct.
Also, be aware that with meshes you will sometimes see another number called LOD (level of detail).

Re: Are lower MESH numbers better then higher?

PostPosted: Thu Feb 26, 2004 12:27 pm
by svenpurple7

Actually the higher LOD (Level Of Detail) number, the better. :)


Joe_D, you are absolutely correct.  It was a mistake on my part and I blame it on the beer I was drinking at the time.  I meat to say that the higher the LOD, the better which is the opposite of the resolution number.   :P :P

Sorry if I confused anyone besides myself.  Thanks again Joe! :D