FS2004 vs FSX screenshot

Forum dedicated to Microsoft FS2004 - "A Century of Flight".

FS2004 vs FSX screenshot

Postby striker » Tue Aug 05, 2014 1:38 am

I never had FS2004. I did have FS2002 then came back to the hobby and bought FSX and then FSXA.

The other day I saw a use FS2004 box for sale. Still there probably and wonder if I should get it.

Anyone have a direct comparison shot? I'd appreciate it <<q


Otherwise I'll probably just buy it to add to my collection. <<q
User avatar
striker
2nd Lieutenant
2nd Lieutenant
 
Posts: 267
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2002 3:18 pm
Location: Wilmington, NC

Re: FS2004 vs FSX screenshot

Postby fox2 » Tue Aug 05, 2014 3:16 pm

Image
FSX

Image
FS2004
fox2
 

Re: FS2004 vs FSX screenshot

Postby garymbuska » Wed Aug 06, 2014 9:56 am

striker wrote:I never had FS2004. I did have FS2002 then came back to the hobby and bought FSX and then FSXA.

The other day I saw a use FS2004 box for sale. Still there probably and wonder if I should get it.

Anyone have a direct comparison shot? I'd appreciate it <<q


Otherwise I'll probably just buy it to add to my collection. <<q


One of the main reasons for having FS2004 is there are a ton of both freeware and payware for it. I use both FS2004 otherwise known as FS9 and FSX
Software for FSX is slowly making its way but it is nothing compared to FS9. Now as far as appearances go that depends on the system you put them on.
FSX is a CPU and RAM hungry program in order to set all sliders to max you need a more up to date system. Where FS9 is not that demanding unless you are using a dinosaur for a system.

<<v
Gary M Buska
SYSTEM Specs ASUS P8Z68 V/GEN 3 mother board: INTELL I7 2600k 3.48 ghz Quad core CPU with Sandy bridge: 12 Gigs of 1800hz ram:
GTX 950 OVER CLOCKED: 2 Gigs Ram Windows 10 Home 64 bit Operating system. 750W Dedicated modular power supply. Two Internal 1TB hard drives 1 External 1TB 3.2 USB hard drive. SAITEK Cessna flight Yoke with throttles.
CH Rudder Peddles 27 inch Wide screen Monitor
User avatar
garymbuska
Major
Major
 
Posts: 4415
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2003 11:10 am
Location: Jacksonville, Florida

Re: FS2004 vs FSX screenshot

Postby Fozzer » Wed Aug 06, 2014 10:51 am

My FS 2004 was quite a nice upgrade from my FS 2002....
My FSX was a pleasant upgrade from my FS 2004, with a few more extra bits and bobs added.
Both FS 2004 and FSX are fantastic programs!

I run both FS 2004 and FSX, and much of my FS 2002/FS 2004 scenery, aircraft, etc, files are installed in my FSX!

Loads of fantastic FS 2004 "stuff" runs successfully in FSX!....always worth a try!... :dance: ...!

...and, of course, FS 2004 runs smoothly on slightly low-end computers... :D ....!

Paul.... :mrgreen: ...!
Win 8.1 64-bit. DX11. Advent Tower. Intel i7-3770 3.9 GHz 8-core. 8 GB System RAM. AMD Radeon HD 7700 1GB RAM. DVD ROM. 2 Terra Byte SATA Hard Drive. Philips 17" LCD Monitor. Saitek Cyborg X Fly-5 Joystick. ...and a Briggs and Stratton Petrol Lawn Mower.
User avatar
Fozzer
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 27361
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2002 3:11 pm
Location: Hereford. England. EGBS.

Re: FS2004 vs FSX screenshot

Postby Apex » Wed Aug 06, 2014 4:46 pm

I'm perfectly happy with FS9, haven't had time anyway to check out FSX. Yeah, there's a lot of free stuff out scenery-wise for FS9. But one thing that's important, if you do get FS9, get the bridges update, you can find that on Microsoft's website somewhere, it's a big deal. The bridges everywhere will look like the bridges they're supposed to look like.

I'm running FS9 on Win7, I forget the spec, but I get good frame rates and no problems anywhere.
Apex
Major
Major
 
Posts: 1280
Joined: Sun Oct 19, 2003 10:33 pm


Return to FS 2004 - A Century of Flight

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 110 guests