Things we want

Forum dedicated to Microsoft FS2004 - "A Century of Flight".

Re: Things we want

Postby Mobius » Fri Apr 15, 2005 12:00 am

FS2006! ;D

This is from 2003. :P

Image

;D ;D ;D ;)
Image
User avatar
Mobius
Major
Major
 
Posts: 3653
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 10:44 pm
Location: Wisconsin

Re: Things we want

Postby -sam- » Fri Apr 15, 2005 4:37 am

hehe  ;D
maybe we can keep this thread alive until fs 2008

no seriously.. what i want for fs 2006 is not
very much... all I want is... everything and that multiplied
by 10.. maybe a little more but that is just optional  ;D
please microsoft !! shouldn
NFo/Simviation Multiplayer Server.

fs.netfrag.org:23456

Stats: fs.netfrag.org
Teamspeak: ts.netfrag.org
User avatar
-sam-
Captain
Captain
 
Posts: 590
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2004 10:03 am
Location: EDDM

Re: Things we want

Postby Gary R. » Fri Apr 15, 2005 11:36 pm

1. More realistic ATC (emergencies, route change requests, etc.

2. Voice response support for ATC.

3.  Airliners and turbines equipped with at least an LNAV capable FMC's which can be route entered within the sim. A Garminlike navigator on a 747 is the most rediculous thing i've ever seen.

4. Default weather radar, either WX or uplinked nexrad modeled.

5. The choice to start a flight cold and dark or engines already running.

6. More realistic default cockpits.  I would rather have only 3 or 4 default aircraft that are completely system simulated than the wide range currently available but with the generic cockpits they have. The default planes in fly 2 had very detailed instrumentation for instance.  Too bad the platform was so buggy.

7. Much better flight dynamics.  MS should develope a program similar to xplane's which can automatically generate an accurate flight dynamic for the airframe and power available.  Take the human estimation out of it.

8. More accurate weather, IE microbursts etc.

Don't some of you say I'm asking too much because everything I just mentioned was already done in other programs to various degrees and I happen to think that a giant like MS should have the resources to bring it all together and pull it off.  Unless these bare minimums are met FS will continue to be classified as a "game" rather than achieving the status of a true simulator.  Xplane achieved it, Elite achieved it.  Both much smaller companies than MS.  Why shouldn't MS expand their FS market by striving for FAA approval and therefor official realworld flight training as well as being an excellent entertainment platform??  Oh, and by the way.  Does MS game studios have an email link?  If so then wouldn't it be good to bombard the people responsible with these requests?
AMD 2800xp on gigabyte vt600l k7 triton overclocked @ 2.3 ghz, 768 PC 3200, 128 DDR 6600GT AGP, 60 gig,5200 rpm maxtor, 160gig 7200rpm WD, Sony FD Trinitron 19
Gary R.
Captain
Captain
 
Posts: 793
Joined: Sat Aug 16, 2003 10:51 am
Location: PA, USA

Re: Things we want

Postby JBaymore » Sat Apr 16, 2005 10:11 am

[quote]Unless these bare minimums are met FS will continue to be classified as a "game" rather than achieving the status of a true simulator.
Image ImageIntel i7 960 quad 3.2G LGA 1366, Asus P6X58D Premium, 750W Corsair, 6 gig 1600 DDR3, Spinpoint 1TB 720
User avatar
JBaymore
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
 
Posts: 10020
Joined: Sat May 24, 2003 9:15 am
Location: New Hampshire

Previous

Return to FS 2004 - A Century of Flight

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 369 guests