Is the Cessna real?

Forum dedicated to Microsoft FS2004 - "A Century of Flight".

Re: Is the Cessna real?

Postby Brett_Henderson » Wed Apr 27, 2005 10:07 pm

How about this paint job ?    ;)

Image
Last edited by Brett_Henderson on Wed Apr 27, 2005 10:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Brett_Henderson
Major
Major
 
Posts: 3403
Joined: Fri Oct 08, 2004 7:09 am

Re: Is the Cessna real?

Postby Alphajet_Enthusiast » Thu Apr 28, 2005 6:37 am

Well I started lessons in a Lambada, registered OK-HUA 47. Heres a pic of it. Its a very light aircraft, remarkably similar to the DA-20 Katana.

Image

If I have to compare the handling characteristics I experience in this aircraft, I have to say Flight sim is pretty close to the real thing. However, in flight sim you have very little realistic effect of thermals, and the stability is sometimes unrealistic. But for the rest its quite real!
Last edited by Alphajet_Enthusiast on Thu Apr 28, 2005 6:38 am, edited 1 time in total.
Image
Macbook Pro | Nvidia Geforce 8600M GT | 2GB Ram | 2.6GHz Intel Core 2 Duo | Mac OSX 10.5 Leopard
User avatar
Alphajet_Enthusiast
Major
Major
 
Posts: 2858
Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2005 12:49 pm

Re: Is the Cessna real?

Postby beaky » Thu Apr 28, 2005 9:03 am

How about this paint job ?    ;)

Image


Say, that looks familiar... why, it's good ol' Two
Three Foxtrot!  
Hey... what happened to the wheel pants? ;D
Last edited by beaky on Thu Apr 28, 2005 9:04 am, edited 1 time in total.
Image
User avatar
beaky
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
 
Posts: 12877
Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2004 8:00 am
Location: Shenandoah, PA USA

Re: Is the Cessna real?

Postby Fozzer » Thu Apr 28, 2005 12:28 pm

150/152 is too damn small.  I'm cramped enough in the 172-and I don't have good orginisation in cramped spaces (has been a problem on cross-countries). ::) :P


Cessna 152 = PPL Flying School Trainer.
Cessna 172 = PPL Family tourer, (After you've got your licence)...!

Image

Paul...5' 7", 154 lbs = C152!... ;)... 8)...!
LOL...!
Win 8.1 64-bit. DX11. Advent Tower. Intel i7-3770 3.9 GHz 8-core. 8 GB System RAM. AMD Radeon HD 7700 1GB RAM. DVD ROM. 2 Terra Byte SATA Hard Drive. Philips 17" LCD Monitor. Saitek Cyborg X Fly-5 Joystick. ...and a Briggs and Stratton Petrol Lawn Mower.
User avatar
Fozzer
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 27369
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2002 3:11 pm
Location: Hereford. England. EGBS.

Re: Is the Cessna real?

Postby TacitBlue » Thu Apr 28, 2005 12:52 pm

Ill be training in a C172 at the rate of (about) $62.00 per hour. That covers all of it, gas, oil, instructor and plane rental. I think its a good deal.
Image
A&P Mechanic, Rankin Aircraft 78Y

Aircraft are naturally beautiful because form follows function. -TB
User avatar
TacitBlue
Major
Major
 
Posts: 3856
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 12:33 pm
Location: Saint Joseph, Missouri, USA

Re: Is the Cessna real?

Postby Fozzer » Thu Apr 28, 2005 1:10 pm

Ill be training in a C172 at the rate of (about) $62.00 per hour. That covers all of it, gas, oil, instructor and plane rental. I think its a good deal.


If that's a regular training school then you've certainly got a good deal there.
The Cessna 172 is considerably more expensive to operate than the Cessna 152, which is why most schools in Great Britain prefer using the '150/152 as trainers.
Note: the handling characteristics are very different between the two models, 152/172.
The centre of gravity is much further forward on the 172, requiring more nose-up trim...!
I find the handling just about perfect on the Cessna 152...
...but then, I fit it nicely... ;)... ;D...!
Tee-Hee...!

Paul.
Last edited by Fozzer on Thu Apr 28, 2005 1:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Win 8.1 64-bit. DX11. Advent Tower. Intel i7-3770 3.9 GHz 8-core. 8 GB System RAM. AMD Radeon HD 7700 1GB RAM. DVD ROM. 2 Terra Byte SATA Hard Drive. Philips 17" LCD Monitor. Saitek Cyborg X Fly-5 Joystick. ...and a Briggs and Stratton Petrol Lawn Mower.
User avatar
Fozzer
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 27369
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2002 3:11 pm
Location: Hereford. England. EGBS.

Re: Is the Cessna real?

Postby Brett_Henderson » Thu Apr 28, 2005 8:29 pm

It's true that the 172 and 152 are much different planes, far as learning and technique... the 152 being much easier.

I'll admit that if I coulda fit in a 152, I probably would have done that first 40 hours at $30 less per hour, but really.. you don't save that much, 'cause you'll have to learn a 172-type plane if you ever want to go anywhere with anyone on board... and that's quite a few hours that you coulda mastered in the first place. Even if it's just you flying later on.. a 152 gets "un-fun" in a hurry. They're slow and cramped and quite frankly, not as safe if you ever.. well you know  ;)


(hey rotty.. if you want that texture.. email me)
Brett_Henderson
Major
Major
 
Posts: 3403
Joined: Fri Oct 08, 2004 7:09 am

Previous

Return to FS 2004 - A Century of Flight

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 238 guests