ATC tried to kill me

[z1010]

WJI : "MEA or MSA: we all know what it is ???



There seems to be one (just one) person who doesn't know what it is. The same odd person doesn't know what _APP and _TWR is.

There must be another odd person who is friendly enough to explain these things  >:(


Than we all know !

[beefhole]

z, look up at his first post.  MEA and MSA are explained there. _APP and _TWR is referring to approach and tower frequencies, respectively.  wji, that is very interesting, I suppose you just may be right. Will keep that in mind  :)

[wji]

"I suppose you just may be right."
hey, there's always a first time . . .  ;-)
bill
GLOSSARY (again)

[z1010]

Beefhole, WJI:

I reacted to fast.

Have read it - thanks.

[Hai Perso Coyone?]

well you see, i asked the same kind of question a while back, but for FS2002, okay maybe FS2002 ATC is just stupid but then again it was the first time MS used ATC

http://www.simviation.com/cgi-bin/yabb/ ... 1100021569

i had a whole bunch of good replies

cheers,
ashar

PS:and yes FS atc will always be stupid

[beefhole]

I'm tired of people being all up in arms against ATC. No, in my experience they're not stupid (many people who complain about vectoring aren't aware that in real life aircraft are often brought in on a "90 to final", not a direct approach). It's amazing it's there in the first place, there isn't that many problems with it, attack something else.

[Hai Perso Coyone?]

MEA-Middle East Airlines

[z1010]

I'm not 'in arms against ATC', I try to understand it.

I want to know why "it "reacts as it reacts (and if I can trust on it).