FL

Forum dedicated to Microsoft FS2004 - "A Century of Flight".

FL

Postby boyanpilot » Sun Oct 29, 2006 7:47 am

I haave an Opensky 737800 and its written in airplane spec that he can fly 3,353 nm,but I cant come up to 2,100 or so...at FL 330 so does airplanes in FS and Real aviation spend less fuel if they fly at higher FL-s ....

thanks
i love simming and i am on it since 2002 i am greate message to you all love sim and love it for ever
User avatar
boyanpilot
2nd Lieutenant
2nd Lieutenant
 
Posts: 73
Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2005 7:54 pm

Re: FL

Postby ashaman » Sun Oct 29, 2006 7:59 am

If you feel that a given plane has not the autonomy it should, open its aircraft.cfg, find the string "fuel_flow_scalar=" and try reducing slightly the given value. You'll have to experiment a little to get it right, but it works.

What that string does is to control the fuel flow efficiency. I myself have been able to make a LIRF-RJAA with the PM2 Concorde with no refuel stop tinkering with that value in that plane. ;D
There's but one real cure for human stupidity. It's called DEATH.

At the moment mourning the assassination of sarcasm and irony for the good of the "higher".

Proud FSIX user. Active user of FS98, X-plane and novic
User avatar
ashaman
Major
Major
 
Posts: 1741
Joined: Thu Nov 27, 2003 9:08 am
Location: LIRN

Re: FL

Postby Nexus » Sun Oct 29, 2006 9:02 am

Yes, the fuel consumption will decrease if you fly higher because you will mett less resistance (drag) since the air is thinner.

However you cant just take off at max takeoff weight and rocket up to  FL410. You will be too heavy and the engines wont have enough power to get you up there.

In theory ,the optimal flight path would be a constant increase in altitud. But since that is very hard to get right IRL, airliners use a thing called stepclimb instead.
Nexus
Major
Major
 
Posts: 3240
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2003 4:18 pm


Return to FS 2004 - A Century of Flight

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 199 guests