non-ILS Landing

Forum dedicated to Microsoft FS2004 - "A Century of Flight".

Re: non-ILS Landing

Postby Nav » Mon Nov 22, 2004 9:59 pm

erhard, that's all good advice - particularly doing the lessons, and saving a practice flight.  A few other things worth mentioning:-

1. In normal flight, you would expect to use the stick to climb and descend, the throttle to adjust the speed.  On a landing approach these controls are REVERSED.  If the speed is too high or too low, raise or lower the nose a touch; if the rate of descent is too high or too low (500 feet per minute or so is what you need) add or reduce power.

2.  Trim is very important.  If you find that you are having to hold the nose high or low with the stick, adjust the trim - after a while, provided you've got the approach speed and the rate of descent right, you should be able to trim the aeroplane pretty well 'hands off', needing only the occasional adjustment.

3.  One of the reasons that practice is essential is that your eye needs 'training' in judging the approach in two dimensions - height and distance.  When practising, at first, set the ILS up anyway, even though you're not going to use it.  Then click on 'Aircraft/'Visual Flight Path/Rectangles'.  You'll find the correct glidepath all set out for you in red squares on the windscreen.  Then practise getting the pitch, power, and trim right and you'll soon be 'on your way'.

4.  Come to think of it, with a strange aeroplane, it's not a bad idea to fly an ILS approach anyway, first off, and mainly watch the instruments.  That'll give you a pretty good idea of the correct power settings, rate of descent, and nose position for that model, help when you start landing VFR.
Nav
Captain
Captain
 
Posts: 717
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2004 11:29 pm

Re: non-ILS Landing

Postby logjam » Tue Nov 23, 2004 12:26 am

Hmmm. Basically you will find that your power settings adjust lift. ie low power setting = descent. High power setting = climb. Your cruise power setting will depend on all up weight, desired airspeed and economy. Now, use the elevator input be it stick or yoke to adjust airspeed, be it on the climb, cruise or descent. Use the trim to maintain airspeed. Please, please, please go through the flight lessons starting with lesson #1 "Straight and Level flight." ::)
Image

Making a World of Difference
User avatar
logjam
Major
Major
 
Posts: 1301
Joined: Tue Mar 26, 2002 3:10 am
Location: Lillooet, BC Canada

Re: non-ILS Landing

Postby vohy » Tue Nov 23, 2004 9:12 am

[quote]
if there are the VASIs on the left of the runway, keep them to two red, two white and bring it down nice and easy,
vohy
Ground hog
Ground hog
 
Posts: 39
Joined: Sat Nov 13, 2004 2:20 am

Re: non-ILS Landing

Postby commoner » Tue Nov 23, 2004 9:29 am

Hi Vohy...Never noticed that row of
Last edited by commoner on Tue Nov 23, 2004 9:37 am, edited 1 time in total.
Image"In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. But, in practice, there is."
User avatar
commoner
Major
Major
 
Posts: 3221
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2004 2:26 am
Location: Yorkshire. England. UK.

Re: non-ILS Landing

Postby MadDriver » Tue Nov 23, 2004 7:11 pm

I always found lining up with the runway was the hardest part of landing for me in a commercial jet.  It took me a while, but now I can land any aircraft basically, although those 747s give me a rough time.  I think he just needs to practice more, and take the time to learn.
User avatar
MadDriver
2nd Lieutenant
2nd Lieutenant
 
Posts: 116
Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2004 3:03 am
Location: Anchorage, Alaska

Re: non-ILS Landing

Postby krylite » Wed Nov 24, 2004 5:35 pm

I can pretty much land safely when locked on the glideslope in a jetliner.  When not on VASI it's a bit harder and I try to adjust last minute when I should probably go around landing safely 90% of the time. (lke when diving down into overcast 500 to ground; i didn't set it, had real time weather on, and a cloud just blanketed the entire airport near the ground.)

Sometimes with an unrefined addon jet, the panels and controls don't correspond well. Like flaps above 15 degrees becomes way too much and the jetliner sinks below the glideslope too fast. Then I had to stick to 15 degrees far longer than the MS 747 or 737 to make it to the runway. Anyone had the same problem with suggestions?
Image
Waiting for the Queen, PMDG!
ega-GeForce FX5200 128mb DDR AGP8x
krylite
2nd Lieutenant
2nd Lieutenant
 
Posts: 89
Joined: Thu May 27, 2004 4:21 pm

Re: non-ILS Landing

Postby hbshawaii » Fri Nov 26, 2004 8:40 pm

Hey ErHard,

I agree with everything that has been posted on this.  Here's my observation:

Since most of us mere mortals don't have the flight time or wherewithall to get to sit in a big jet, the slogan "as good as it gets" applies.  It's tough to land big jets using a simulator without accumulated skill.  It's REALLY hard to land a big jet without using the aid of ILS.  There is just too much that has to happen really fast.

I always likenened it to controlling a falling rock in 3 dimensions.  Thankfully, big jets when configured for landing retain lift.  I have found, through my own inexperience that trying to land a big jet without benefit of an autopiloted ILS assist is beyond my ability.  

I have discovered that in FS2004, using autopilot ILS lines you up on the centerline using flight dynamics I can't seem to recreate safely on my own.  Trying to line up the runway manually at low speed with approach settings prove  sluggish at best and usually end in disaster.  I have enough to think about just controlling the descent and touchdown.  

I would like certified big jet pilots to weigh in on this.

I guess I'm saying to avoid non-ILS runways until you get the big jet landing procedure wired.

Standing by for comments...
The weather is here, wish you were beautiful...
Henry-Honolulu
PHNL
ATIS 127.9
User avatar
hbshawaii
Ground hog
Ground hog
 
Posts: 24
Joined: Sun Nov 14, 2004 2:31 am
Location: Honolulu

Re: non-ILS Landing

Postby Brute » Fri Nov 26, 2004 8:57 pm

I myself find it easier to land a 777 on a non-ILS runway :o if I land on a ILS runway , I end up kicking myself as to why I can't keep everything perfect  :( I can however keep the VASI lights red x2 and white x2 but thats my hang up....post complete... :-[
Future pilot...so you can scream to god, he cant hear you
User avatar
Brute
2nd Lieutenant
2nd Lieutenant
 
Posts: 128
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2004 6:24 pm

Re: non-ILS Landing

Postby Foxtrot Sport » Fri Nov 26, 2004 11:14 pm

Hey,

Since I am too lazy to really learn an ILS landing in a heavy, I have become quite good that those considering I will fly a heavy 60 % of the time.  And all the help I need is that VASI on the side.  

Not to sound like I am better than everyone, becuase I asure you, I am not.

-HF  ;D
Image
Formerly HighFlyer24
User avatar
Foxtrot Sport
Major
Major
 
Posts: 1027
Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2004 12:33 pm
Location: Sacramento, California

Re: non-ILS Landing

Postby Nav » Fri Nov 26, 2004 11:40 pm

I'm not boasting either - but, from long practice, I can now land any aeroplane on FS2004 visually.
Last edited by Nav on Fri Nov 26, 2004 11:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Nav
Captain
Captain
 
Posts: 717
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2004 11:29 pm

Previous

Return to FS 2004 - A Century of Flight

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 931 guests