FS2004 vs FS2002

Forum dedicated to Microsoft FS2004 - "A Century of Flight".

FS2004 vs FS2002

Postby Barney » Mon Oct 25, 2004 7:55 pm

I still currently have FS2002 Professional. I have a considerable number of instrument approaches set up that I use to brush up on prior to flying them in real life.

Is FS2004 more sophisticated than 2002?
Can I install 2004 without losing all of my approaches?
What is the main difference between 2002 and 2004?
Barney
Ground hog
Ground hog
 
Posts: 5
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 6:45 am
Location: Sutton Australia

Re: FS2004 vs FS2002

Postby MichaelH » Mon Oct 25, 2004 9:37 pm

Is FS2004 more sophisticated than 2002?

Not really. It has a much nicer GPS.
The real difference is in the quality of the graphics (clouds, weather effects etc.)
It is light years beyond FS 2002.
But, it takes much more computing power, video processing power, and memory than 2002 to get out most of what is in there.
User avatar
MichaelH
2nd Lieutenant
2nd Lieutenant
 
Posts: 88
Joined: Mon Oct 06, 2003 1:19 pm

Re: FS2004 vs FS2002

Postby Barney » Mon Oct 25, 2004 10:01 pm

Michael, thank you. What would you recommend in terms of hardware for 2004?
Barney
Ground hog
Ground hog
 
Posts: 5
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 6:45 am
Location: Sutton Australia

Re: FS2004 vs FS2002

Postby MattNW » Mon Oct 25, 2004 10:40 pm

Michael, thank you. What would you recommend in terms of hardware for 2004?



Decide what's the best you can afford and then sell one of the kids and improve on that and you should be all set. (jk)  ;D ;D

Seriously, I wouldn't recommend anything less than a 2 Ghz processor and a gigabyte of RAM. I haven't tested it personally but from what I hear the bus speed is key to good performance so make sure you get a good MB that supports at least 800 Mhz FSB or better and don't get anything integrated.

Some people get decent performance on lesser systems but that's hit and miss. I'm running it on a somewhat marginal system and just barely making out. (AMD 1.8 Ghz processor, GForce 4 128 Mb. I Gb of PC 133 RAM). I can fly out in the boonies pretty well but dense scenery, clouds and AI takes the breath away from my little machine pretty quick.

One thing I have to give Fs9 though, it's a hell of a sim if your machine can handle it. Much improvement over 2002 but you pay a price for the goodies ($$$).
In Memory of John Consterdine (FS Tipster)1962-2003
User avatar
MattNW
Major
Major
 
Posts: 1705
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2003 2:34 pm
Location: Indiana

Re: FS2004 vs FS2002

Postby JBaymore » Tue Oct 26, 2004 6:04 am

Decide what's the best you can afford and then sell one of the kids and improve on that and you should be all set.


Matt,

I think you nailed it pretty well with the first sentence.   ;)

best,

.....................john
Image ImageIntel i7 960 quad 3.2G LGA 1366, Asus P6X58D Premium, 750W Corsair, 6 gig 1600 DDR3, Spinpoint 1TB 720
User avatar
JBaymore
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
 
Posts: 10020
Joined: Sat May 24, 2003 9:15 am
Location: New Hampshire


Return to FS 2004 - A Century of Flight

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 89 guests