What we really are short of...

What aircraft have you been unable to find after a long search? There may be an answer!

What we really are short of...

Postby coalpedlar » Sat Nov 26, 2011 12:57 pm

is quality, realistic repaints of the FSX default A-321.
Very few available for the default aircraft.
Image
coalpedlar
2nd Lieutenant
2nd Lieutenant
 
Posts: 169
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 6:23 pm
Location: Commonwealth of  Virginia USA

Re: What we really are short of...

Postby Fishbed7701 » Sat Nov 26, 2011 2:47 pm

Well, I can see why, I don't know why anyone would fly default aircraft, especially the A321, probably the most unrealistic in the game. I do fly some of the default props though.
PPL(C77)
User avatar
Fishbed7701
2nd Lieutenant
2nd Lieutenant
 
Posts: 220
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2011 11:35 pm
Location: C77

Re: What we really are short of...

Postby garryrussell » Sat Nov 26, 2011 3:29 pm

This is true of most types.

Anyone interested in flying a default covered type will find a better version so there isn't a real serious call for many default aircraft paints.

Not that they don't get painted, but any painter wanting to spend time on a quality paint will not do default aircraft because, for one thing the texture mapping does not allow it to be painted properly in addition to the model not being that accurate.
garryrussell
Captain
Captain
 
Posts: 706
Joined: Sat Mar 22, 2008 10:58 am

Re: What we really are short of...

Postby idahosurge » Sun Nov 27, 2011 8:07 am

is quality, realistic repaints of the FSX default A-321.
Very few available for the default aircraft.


Have you checked out the FSX repaint library section over at avsim?
Asus R3E_i7 980X @ 4.44GHz_TR Silver Arrow_Mushkin Redline 6GB 1,644MHz @ 6-7-6-18_Zotac AMP GTX 480_OS - Windows 7 Ult 64b_OS SSD - Crucial C300 128GB_FSX HD - WD VR 600GB*2 w/3ware 9750-4i 6Gb/s Controller_Corsair AX850_CM HAF-X_FSX Gold, UTX, GEX, FSG,
idahosurge
Captain
Captain
 
Posts: 687
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 9:48 pm
Location: Anna, Texas, USA

Re: What we really are short of...

Postby Club508 » Sun Nov 27, 2011 9:44 am

This is true of most types.

Anyone interested in flying a default covered type will find a better version so there isn't a real serious call for many default aircraft paints.

Not that they don't get painted, but any painter wanting to spend time on a quality paint will not do default aircraft because, for one thing the texture mapping does not allow it to be painted properly in addition to the model not being that accurate.

I go for quality these days, and I rarely ever repaint an aircraft that ISN'T default. :P
And it sure does allow for some proper paints.  You just have to know how to do it. :P
Image
User avatar
Club508
Major
Major
 
Posts: 1528
Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2011 4:00 pm
Location: Planet Earth

Re: What we really are short of...

Postby garryrussell » Tue Nov 29, 2011 12:40 pm

The defaukt don't allow for proper paints there are too many shared flipped areas

It's not a case of knowing how to do it it's a case of whether or not you realise what a quality paint means. :-?

You can do NOTHING about shared flipped texture areas

I've been painting for years I know what I'm taking about. :o
garryrussell
Captain
Captain
 
Posts: 706
Joined: Sat Mar 22, 2008 10:58 am

Re: What we really are short of...

Postby Club508 » Tue Nov 29, 2011 6:13 pm

Shared flipped areas? Can you use a bit better wording?  I'm not quite getting what you're saying.
Image
User avatar
Club508
Major
Major
 
Posts: 1528
Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2011 4:00 pm
Location: Planet Earth

Re: What we really are short of...

Postby garryrussell » Wed Nov 30, 2011 6:19 am

Like wings where one wing does both and some fuse sections that serve both sides.

This means that lettering ends up back to front on the sides of some fins like the Dak and wings can't have registration lettering for the same reason

Default aircraft are as far away from quality as you can get.

The models are not good either shape wise
garryrussell
Captain
Captain
 
Posts: 706
Joined: Sat Mar 22, 2008 10:58 am

Re: What we really are short of...

Postby Club508 » Wed Nov 30, 2011 12:41 pm

Like wings where one wing does both and some fuse sections that serve both sides.

This means that lettering ends up back to front on the sides of some fins like the Dak and wings can't have registration lettering for the same reason

Default aircraft are as far away from quality as you can get.

The models are not good either shape wise


I haven't encountered much of that... But I never really notice or use any lettering either. :P
Image
User avatar
Club508
Major
Major
 
Posts: 1528
Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2011 4:00 pm
Location: Planet Earth

Re: What we really are short of...

Postby garryrussell » Wed Nov 30, 2011 6:38 pm

Well if you do quality paints you would have used lettering. :o

I object above to being told I just need to know how to do it

Search my name and think again ;)
garryrussell
Captain
Captain
 
Posts: 706
Joined: Sat Mar 22, 2008 10:58 am

Re: What we really are short of...

Postby Club508 » Wed Nov 30, 2011 9:52 pm

Well if you do quality paints you would have used lettering. :o
I object above to being told I just need to know how to do it
Search my name and think again ;)

I never said you didn't. :P
Nice paints by the way.

But on the ones where I have used lettering, I never encountered the problem.
Image
User avatar
Club508
Major
Major
 
Posts: 1528
Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2011 4:00 pm
Location: Planet Earth

Re: What we really are short of...

Postby Dave71K » Wed Nov 30, 2011 11:06 pm

I wouldn't says there's a lack of paints for all the default aircraft there are a good fair few for the default 737 and 747.

As for the A321 is not that good so no one uses it. There are A LOT of repaints for the Thomas Ruth airbuses though!
Dave71K
 

Re: What we really are short of...

Postby garryrussell » Thu Dec 01, 2011 4:56 am

This is true of most types.

Anyone interested in flying a default covered type will find a better version so there isn't a real serious call for many default aircraft paints.

Not that they don't get painted, but any painter wanting to spend time on a quality paint will not do default aircraft because, for one thing the texture mapping does not allow it to be painted properly in addition to the model not being that accurate.

I go for quality these days, and I rarely ever repaint an aircraft that ISN'T default. :P
And it sure does allow for some proper paints.
garryrussell
Captain
Captain
 
Posts: 706
Joined: Sat Mar 22, 2008 10:58 am


Return to Aircraft Wanted

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 432 guests