by Speed of flight » Wed Dec 23, 2009 12:50 pm
I saw a significant performance gain with the switch to vista, and then even better with win 7!
I'll help you out.
You know, there's a difference between theory and application. One can say that there SHOULD NOT be a gain just in a simple OS upgrade. However, if he saw one, why tell him he's full of garbage? How do you know? Maybe he is getting better performance with it. I will tell you that I AM getting BETTER PERFORMANCE with windows 7x64 than I ever got with vistax64. My install was unique with this one, though. I saved my important stuff to another HDD, and then formatted the one with the OS going on it. My vista install was plagued with errors and problems.
Never saw 40 FPS with vista. However, there is a MP flight I love to do between KEDW and KLSV that now hits regularly between 80-120 FPS, and got a screenshot with over 209!
:D :o
I'm seriously OC'd, but never hit it before. With WIN 7, and DX10 and all it's charms, I NOTICED a big gain from vista>7. It seems that a few people got really defensive in here, and I don't understand why?!? Poor guy didn't seem like he was trying to anger anyone, just make a point. Theory vs. Application. I, for one, noticed its performance capabilities over XP (with only DX9.0c) and vista. Lets hope I don't anger anyone, and I hope that this sheds light on the arguement over "should" vs. "does".
Asus Crosshair V Formula-Z, NB & FSB @2608 MHz
AMD 8350 @ 5.02 GHz 1.524V (200.6 x 25)
Corsair H100i
16GB GSkill Trident @ 2133 MHz C10
Asus 7870 2 GB 1200core/5500mem
Samsung 250GB SSD
RaidMax 1200W
Cooler Master HAF 932
Windows 7 x64
VRS Superbug/TacPack, Iris A-10A, PMDG 77W, 744 and MD-11
REX texture direct, FTX Global