Simviation Forums

Posted: **Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:33 pm**

Hi all,
I am thinking of getting one of the above mentioned in the poll, and I wanted to ask you which s better? I thought a poll would be a good idea. ;D

Cheers

Posted: **Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:45 pm**

LOMAC most definately...self-shadowing models and all....very nice it is...but very hard too

Posted: **Mon Sep 26, 2005 1:26 pm**

Gonna have to say LOMAC because of all the different things you can do, and different systems there are and also the fact that they are currently making another add-on that lets you fly Helocopters and maybe the F-16 soon, but I'm not so sure.

Posted: **Mon Sep 26, 2005 1:26 pm**

LOMAC most definately...self-shadowing models and all....very nice it is...but very hard too

Ok, but I suppose harder = better, as it would be more realistic, yes?

I'd have to say Lomac

Seems Lomac is the more popular game, and it sounds like the addons would be good!

Posted: **Mon Sep 26, 2005 1:27 pm**

I'm gonna say strike fighters cause as far as I know it actually works. Unlike what i've heard about Lomac...

Posted: **Mon Sep 26, 2005 1:32 pm**

Ok, but I suppose harder = better, as it would be more realistic, yes?

Seems to be the case most of the time...FS is pretty hard with all realism set to hard...so I would say so

Posted: **Mon Sep 26, 2005 3:16 pm**

Strike Fighters multiplied by like, 20 bajillion thousand.

It's way more stable, way more fun, and way more customizeable.

Posted: **Mon Sep 26, 2005 3:24 pm**

Is Strike Fighters still available? I still see plenty of copies LOMAC on the shelves but haven't seen Strike Fighters around since it first came out.

Posted: **Mon Sep 26, 2005 4:13 pm**

www.amazon.com

www.ebay.com

www.ebgames.com

Posted: **Mon Sep 26, 2005 4:21 pm**

I'm gonna say strike fighters cause as far as I know it actually works. Unlike what i've heard about Lomac...

If you get LOMAC and Flaming Cliffs, everything runs nice and smooth. I've had it since May or June and never had a problem.

The difficulty is scalable also, you can set easy radar and things like that so it leans more toward the arcade side if you want it to.

I can't say anything about Stirke Fighters though, I haven't tried it, though it does seem to be a bit more customizable.

Also, it depends on what you want to fly. Strike Fighters is Vietnam era (i.e. F-4, etc..., although you might be able to get add-ons) and LOMAC is more Modern Day to near future (F-15, A-10, MiG-29, etc...).

Posted: **Mon Sep 26, 2005 4:31 pm**

you might be able to get add-ons

www.combatace.com

Posted: **Mon Sep 26, 2005 4:49 pm**

Were missing IL-2!!! Unless you mean the best, of just those two. IL-2 is by far the best Combat flight simulator in my opinion.

Posted: **Tue Sep 27, 2005 1:38 am**

Were missing IL-2!!! Unless you mean the best, of just those two. IL-2 is by far the best Combat flight simulator in my opinion.

I just wanted to see which was the better two, but I have heard very good things about IL-2. Is it any good?

Posted: **Tue Sep 27, 2005 6:02 am**

Strike Fighters all the way.

Posted: **Tue Sep 27, 2005 10:04 am**

No contest Lomac.. Hands Down..

::)

Simviation Forums

Which Combat FS is better?

Which Combat FS is better?

Re: Which Combat FS is better?

Re: Which Combat FS is better?

Re: Which Combat FS is better?

Re: Which Combat FS is better?

Re: Which Combat FS is better?

Re: Which Combat FS is better?

Re: Which Combat FS is better?

Re: Which Combat FS is better?

Re: Which Combat FS is better?

Re: Which Combat FS is better?

Re: Which Combat FS is better?

Re: Which Combat FS is better?

Re: Which Combat FS is better?

Re: Which Combat FS is better?